The New Vaccine Religion

First let me define religion. This is not to say that religion is always bogus or misleading. All the religions of the world contain, sometimes buried within them, deep and meaningful spiritual truths and lessons in morality that we humans desperately need.

I’m writing about that part of religion that leads to fundamentalism, also found in all the religions world wide. Here are statements about the vaccine that are fundamentalist beliefs that cannot be questioned.

  1. We believe that the vaccine is the only solution for Covid. The mantra we recite is what Putin recently said: “Either you get the vaccine or you die of Covid.” Therefore force is advisable for dissenters.
  2. We believe that any questioning of the first belief is heresy. ANY evidence, even scientific evidence, to the contrary has to be suppressed immediately. Any doctors, any scientists dissenting should be threatened for heresy. Sound familiar? Remember the Inquisition?

    There are corollaries to Belief #2.
    • Corollary A. How do we suppress contrary information? Through character assassination of all dissenters. Any dissenter is called a rather stupid and unscientific person. They are redneck idiots who follow Trump. Hot headed, anti maskers, believers that Covid doesn’t exist or is a mild disease like the flu, believers in “my rights over the rights of my fellow citizens” (I’ll do anything I want to because that’s what freedom means). In other words, dissenters who are scientific are shamed just as if they agree to all of these absurd beliefs, so much so that they are afraid to speak out.
    • Corollary B. A belief that any speech along these lines must be suppressed immediately because it is not in the interest of the public good. So youtube videos and scientific lectures are immediately taken down from the internet. This is actually a violation of free speech itself. If that doesn’t sound like totalitarianism, you haven’t studied it.
    • Corollary C. Shaming all people refusing the vax as not upstanding members of the community. There was a sad case of a 23 year old young man with permanent myocarditis from the vax saying “I’m still glad I did it. It was for the community.” (Again there are other ways to minimize contageon and keep the disease mild. These have been suppressed. Using those ways supports the community just as well as taking the vax.)
    • Corollary D. Defining pro-vaccine info as scientific and any and all antivax info as, by definition, unscientific (see first corollary above). This fundamentalist belief actually destroys the meaning of real science. Real science questions everything and freely uses critical thinking to discern what the “real truth” may be. Real science questions experimental designs. Real science looks to the anomalies to see what the next experiment should be. Real science would have been so alarmed by the myriad of myocarditis cases it would have pulled the vax.
  3. We believe that the vax is “perfectly safe.” This is propaganda and is repeated like a mantra by media and everyone else – even Biden. (“It’s perfectly safe so you are a dumb idiot if you don’t rush out and get it.” Many many medical people and PhDs in other fields are refusing to take it. Does that not give pause for thought? The intellectual community is alarmed. Why? It certainly isn’t because they are unscientific idiots.) Here is a brand new article bravely describing how the vax harms. And it appears in a respectable journal – a Vaccinology journal. This is the first of its kind.

    https://ijvtpr.com/index.php/IJVTPR/article/view/23/51

    Too many people are reporting deaths and life long disabilities from it. When the polio vax came out, if one kid died of it, it was pulled and revised. Why isn’t that happening now? Instead every case is dismissed as “He would have died anyway.” (At age 30?) “We can’t blame the vax and it certainly isn’t call for further research.” Or, maybe the most Machiavellian – “We don’t care how many are harmed. If hundreds of thousands die or are maimed, the majority lived.”

    And the corollary to belief #3:
    • All disorders following the vax are deemed “rare” and therefore not to be counted, such as that poor doctor who died of a horrendous blood disease after the vax. It was “rare” so there’s no point in investigating or being curious about it because it will never happen again.

What? It was rare because this disease is a Frankenstein disease (see the early theory below) and the diseases from the vax often imitate it – brain disorders looking like dementia, blood clots, strokes, kidney failure, even death from Covid itself, heart anomalies, Epstein Barr, cancer resurfacing in patients once cured, new cancers where people die in 6 months, weird blood disorders.

There are plenty of pieces of research reporting the great effects of the vaccine for controlling deaths from Covid (which, by the way, I agree with — what I don’t agree with is that the vax is perfectly safe and is the only way to prevent death and contagion from Covid). One such piece from the UK hints at a 3 times rate of death in vaccinated people. (See Table 1 figures in this analysis by the Office of National Statistics in the UK)

I have read and heard so many anecdotal reports of people dying from the vaccine, but that will get us nowhere if there are no epidemiological reports comparing deaths among vaccinated people and deaths among unvaccinated people. I could not find anything other than the UK report mentioned above.

Interestingly, the scientists reporting this did not even comment on this finding. You always comment on stray findings in a scientific report. Why? Is it not popular to do so? Might they lose their jobs?

The CDC apparently picked up on this and recently published their own study. Refuting it, of course. They threw out any subjects in the vaxed group that died in the first 30 days. Hmmmmm.

Here is a theory published very early in the pandemic, in April 2020. Obviously by a scientist who used a pseudonym. Why did he have to do that? Might he lose his job? This essay explained why hydroxychloroquine would work. (Oh no! Another statement linked to Trump. If you talk about that you believe in Trump). All the experiments on hydroxychloroquine verify what Fauci drilled into our heads. This drug is so dangerous it will kill you if you are in the same room with it. (Ha ha) These studies used the wrong design. The drug has to be given within 24 to 48 hours after contracting Covid.

Covid Treatment Theory paper

The experiments showed hydroxychloroquine given at such late stages in the illness – when a patient was already in the ICU – affecting the electrical properties of the heart. Specifically patients given hydroxychloroquine showed an abnormal Q wave as measured on ECGs. This causes death.

In considering results we look for intervening variables – things that could cause the result that we might have missed. For one, the illness itself attacks the heart and anything else in the body that needs oxygen to function. Once heart tissue is destroyed it never recovers. For another, according to an article in Google Scholar, Tylenol consumption drains glutathione. A lack of glutathione is associated with abnormalities in the Q wave.

In one report, a VA hospital in Pennsylvania had nothing else they could do in their crowded conditions but give out hydroxychloroquine. Tylenol was also given out like candy. No one much knows of this research on Tylenol. Sadly they were persecuted because old patients died of faulty Q wave. This was celebrated as an example of why hydroxychloroquine should never be given.

  1. We believe that there is one treatment that is standard of care. Go home, isolate, and when you can’t breathe come into the ER and flood our ICU. This is an actual “treatment” instead of being seen as no treatment at all. It needs renaming as “standard of no care”.

The right wing thinks that the Powers That Be are trying to scare us with Covid. They think the number of cases is being inflated. That ICUs are not overwhelmed. (Who can get into an ICU to find out?) That this disease is just like the flu or just like pneumonia. None of that is true. But here is where the fear comes from:

Promoting this standard of no care DOES absolutely increase fear. ICUs become flooded with people unable to breathe. People are terrified that there is nothing they can do. People were coached to wait for the vax last year because there is nothing else to do and so hundreds of thousands died. That should thoroughly scare you.

Furthermore a powerful reinforcement technique is firmly established to make you run for your booster shots. It is called negative reinforcement and it irons in a response much more powerfully than punishment does. In the lab a rat is mildly continuously shocked until it presses a bar. Then the shock is over. You can believe that rat will bar press like crazy as soon as the mild shock starts. We have been taught through experiencing deaths from Covid that the vax will end our anxiety and fear. It is the only thing that will end it.

The truth is there always has been a home treatment that suppresses the virus in the very earliest of stages. Fauci knew that because of a paper published in 2005 under the aegis of his organization. It was an in vitro study showing hydroxychloroquine to suppress the Sars virus. Furthermore the scientists at the Human lab published the genome and the cure for Covid at the same time – hydroxychloroquine, which now we know has to be taken within the first 48 hours of the first symptom, much like Tamiflu.

There is no way to conduct an experiment on taking it so soon. For one thing, no one should wait for a test nor rely on tests that have both false positives and false negatives. You have to rely on self-reports – something all scientists are loath to do. Secondly, how can you in all conscience have a control group with a placebo when we now know that if you don’t treat immediately you risk death? In old experiments on say, cancer, the control group has time to wait to be treated after the experiment is over. Not so in this case.

Hydroxychloroquine was painted as a lethal dangerous drug when African doctors say they have been using it for years in Africa – 60 years – and giving it to children to prevent malaria. The Powers That Be did not want anyone finding out it worked and they did everything they could to discredit it.

Why? According to the Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) the FDA may authorize
unapproved medical products – the vaccine – if there are no “adequate, approved and available
alternatives.”

Now Ivermectin, effectively used world wide as a prevention and an early treatment, is also
under attack.

Why?

Was it money?